Another book on the way…

Proposed cover

Proposed cover

UPDATED 8/1/14: The script has now been published (ISBN: 978-1-291-62773-2) and is available from from lulu, Amazon and possibly from other booksellers.

I’m planning to publish the script of my 2005 play Upside Down and Back to Front as a book in the near future. I’ve sent off for a proof copy and this is the cover I’m thinking of using.

The play tells the story of a photographer travelling around Worcestershire in 1913 and the present-day story of a batch of pictures being found in an attic. It has loads of characters, which means the cast of three have to work really hard!

The play was commissioned and produced by artworcs at the Number 8 Community Arts Centre in Pershore. It was fun to do.

The cover image features my Gran in the hop yards when she was a girl.

More news on this soon.

Advertisements

The other storm

After the ‘St Jude’s Day’ storm came the ‘not quite stormy enough to be named’ storm on the following Sunday. Apart from scaring me silly while driving home it didn’t have much of a lasting effect. However, these things must be documented…

Shingle flung several inches on to the promenade

Shingle flung several inches on to the promenade

Storm damage leads to Bexhill's first restaurant dedicated to male extra terrestrials

Storm damage leads to Bexhill’s first restaurant dedicated to male extra terrestrials

 

At work

It’s been a tough couple of days at work.

At the weekend Bodiam ran an All Souls evening event called The Red Lady – a kind of adventure game / theatre piece. I was the audience’s guide as they strove to solve a series of riddles. It was great fun and wonderful to be working in the castle after dark.

The Sunday night late show was a pretty damp affair, though the worst of the wind and rain was only really winding up as the show finished. It was a pretty frightening drive home.

A great deal of credit to producer Laura, writer Simon, the cast (including the Heathcliff Heroics contingent) and the guys from the Premises team who set up the lights to make it possible. Do look out to see if the event is repeated in Bodiam’s 2014 calendar.

New images

A visitor to the castle – Jim Barker – sent me some pictures of me in action as William the Forester. I have very few pictures of me at work and I really like these. These pictures are displayed with Jim’s permission. Click on an image to see the gallery.

 

Bodiam Castle Bits #5 – The Gatehouse

Bodiam Castle Bits is a series of posts looking at details of the castle that may have passed you by. Bodiam Castle is a NT property in East Sussex, England.

This post considers the main gatehouse

Gatehouse

Apologies – It has been a long time since the last post but the winter season at work will allow a bit more time to re-engage with blogging, though probably not as regularly as before.

During the summer I managed to buy a couple of eighteenth century prints of the castle from eBay. This one shows the castle courtyard looking north towards the main gatehouse.

Bodiam Castle Gatehouse

The gatehouse viewed from the courtyard

The seller described it as “A plate taken from Francis Grose’s Antiquities of England and Wales. London Printed for Hooper & Wigstead, 212 High Holborn facing Southampton Street, Bloomsbury Square. Published 27th May 1785 by S Hooper”. This would be the era of Webster ownership. I suspect the original image dates from a few years earlier.

It’s a good impression of the castle – fascinating to see the trees, bushes and ivy which were only eventually cleared by Lord Curzon after 1917. The earth seems to pile up against the wall on the left (west). The reason I’m interested in the image, however, is its depiction of the gatehouse. I know that it is not a photograph and cannot be read as fact, but it is not just an artist’s impression either. At the very least it begs some questions.

The gatehouse today is recognisably the same building…

The gatehouse today

The gatehouse today

The crenelations have been restored and a couple of chimney pots have gone but the images (taken from slightly different angles) line up pretty well.

The differences

There are a couple of differences, though, that are worth a second look. Here’s a close up from the 1785 engraving…

Close up of the gatehouse (1785)

Close up of the gatehouse (1785)

The proportions inside the arch seem a bit awry but the rest is pretty good.

The gatehouse’s stair turrets are rather odd. The main turret which goes from ground level to the summit is set in the first (further) bay and is largely the same in both images. The shorter turret butts up against the main turret but only goes to the first level above the second (nearer) bay. The second bay was added late in the building process and is of a poorer quality of construction. The second stair turret seems to be a late addition to the design and blocks some of the lights to the main turret necessitating the construction of through lights.

The photograph shows that this second turret is now ruined. The first few steps are visible (one of only two staircases in the castle that turn anticlockwise) but are cut in half by a large buttress (19th or early 20th century?) added to support the second bay.

The 1785 engraving shows this turret still intact. It has a flat top and only goes as far as the platform above the second bay. No door is visible from the courtyard. The remaining stairs do not start until a few feet above ground level so it might be that access was from the chambers on the ground floor of the east side of the north range.

There are no lights shown in the face of the turret, so it is not clear how daylight could have got to the through light in the photograph.

The other major difference between the two images is a large buttress projecting from the left hand side of the arch into the courtyard. I can see no evidence of this in the photograph or in situ. Was this an early repair since removed?

Of course, all of these ‘differences’ may be the result of the engraver misinterpreting or simplifying an original watercolour made by an artist who felt at liberty to ‘improve’ the original to make it more picturesque.

I hope to find time this winter to look through some archive photographs of the castle taken in the early twentieth century. Maybe there will be a few more clues there.

Previously on Bodiam Castle Bits…

  1. SW corner of the courtyard
  2. “The Lady’s Bower”
  3. A chapel window
  4. Chimneys

Inigo Jones et al

As Inigo Jones at the Banqueting House

As Inigo Jones at the Banqueting House (c) 2013 Lance Woodman

This summer has been very busy indeed. During one period I worked 46 days in a row with only one day off. I’m going to be taking it a bit easier in September.

I have started working as a freelance live interpreter in addition to my ‘day job’ at Bodiam Castle. I applied to top live interpretation Past Pleasures at the start of the year and, after a series of interviews and workshops, was added to their large team of live interpreters.

Sir Edward Dallingridge

Sir Edward Dallingridge at Bodiam Castle’s Medieval Event August 2013. Photo (c) 2013 Helene Marler

I have been working at Dover Castle and the Banqueting House in Whitehall, London for PP.

At Dover I’ve been Ranulf de Glanvill, Chief Justiciar of Henry II, William de Hommet, Constable of the King’s Household and Wulfheard the Saxon armourer.

At the Banqueting House I was one of PP’s Inigo Jones in a project about the Stuart masques which involved performing in front of a 7 metre high animation screen. It was a bit nerve-racking at first, but by the last of my shifts I was really enjoying it. It has been great to work as part of a team of talented live interpreters and at some beautiful sites.

Of course, as soon as I found extra work an opportunity came up at Bodiam to work extra hours there. I even got to ‘be’ Sir Edward Dallingridge for a couple of days. After two lean years it has been great to be earning enough to get by on again, but I don’t think I could work another summer like this.

The Worcester Century Plays

Book cover

Book cover

We have published the text of the 2001 Worcester Century Plays as a book. The ISBN is 978-1-291-36856-7 and it is available from Amazon and from Lulu.

My contributions to the Century Plays were my first professional commissions. The whole  project was a delight to be involved in. I enjoyed working as part of a writing team. The size of the company (7 professional actors and 25 community actors) set all sorts of interesting challenges to be sorted out.

The plays were commissioned by Worcester Theatre Company in association with Swan Playwrights. The first performances were at Worcester Swan Theatre on 7-28 April 2001. Jenny Stephens and Kim Greengrass directed.

Hiatus

Apologies for the lack of posts recently. After a couple of lean years I am suddenly working much more and time is at a premium.

However, much of the new work is seasonal and I hope to be blogging regularly later in the year.

A production of ‘Now’

My youth theatre play ‘now‘ will get another production.

It will be directed by the original director Mel Lewis for her youth theatre company Tremor.

The performance will be part of the Worcestershire Theatre Festival at The Norbury Theatre, Droitwich on Saturday 6th April. Looking at the Tremor site, it might also be having a run on 23rd March at Bishop Perowne College on 23rd March as well.

Good luck to Mel and the company. This will be the sixth production of ‘now‘ making it easily my most performed play.

The script is available in Three Plays for Youth Theatre which is currently discounted on Amazon (just sayin’).

Bodiam Castle Bits #4 – Chimneys

Lord's and Lady's apartments (E range): fireplaces with chimneys above

East range: fireplaces with chimneys above (click to enlarge)

Bodiam Castle Bits is a series of posts looking at details of the castle that may have passed you by. Bodiam Castle is a NT property in East Sussex, England.

This post considers the chimneys

Chimneys

The context

There are, I am assured, thirty three fireplaces at the Castle. They vary in size from the 13′ (4m) wide kitchen fires to small fireplaces in the tower rooms. When the Castle was in full occupancy they would have consumed enormous amounts of firewood. Somewhere on site would have been a substantially sized wood store.

Firewood was a major ‘crop’ from the woods of the Weald. There are records of firewood being shipped from Bodiam to the continent during the time of the Castle’s builder, Sir Edward Dallingridge[1].

The plumbing of the chimneys is sophisticated. Where fireplaces are one above the other the flues run one behind the other. In the photo (L) you can just make out the two chimney pots in line. This is an impressive feat of design and execution.

The chimneys

You can look up some of the chimneys to see the sky. This is particularly easy in the kitchen’s ‘pottage’ fire (the ‘roasting’ fire on the outer wall’s chimney has been capped) and the fireplaces in the controversially named ‘retainers’ kitchen’ in the West range.

Looking up one of the chimneys in the 'retainers' kitchen'

Looking up one of the chimneys in the ‘retainers’ kitchen’

If you’re looking up the chimneys of some of the smaller fireplaces in the towers, do watch your head. I speak from experience on this matter.

Lower's 1871 sketch showing crenelations

Lower’s 1871 sketch showing crenelations

Many of the chimney stacks have disappeared but there are still a few to be seen. There are good examples on the North and East ranges. The stack on the accessible North range battlements  has gone, but this does give you the opportunity to look down the chimney flue towards the fireplace.

Mark Lower (1871) described the chimneys as octagonal, over 9′ tall and in the late perpendicular style. He suggested that they may originally have been topped with crenelations but, he says, these decorations had eroded away. I’m not entirely convinced by that suggestion but it is difficult to get close enough to the remaining stacks to make a judgement.

He also suggested that the chimney stacks may have been added later, perhaps feeling that they were too advanced in style for 1385. They do have a Tudor feel about them, though rendered in stone rather than brick.

The later date seems unlikely. A close up of the east range stacks against the tower (below) shows how the moulding at the top of the chimney echoes the form of the moulding on the tower itself. It also shows similarities to the remaining moulding in the SW corner of the courtyard.

A close up of the East range stacks

A close up of the East range stacks

They do feel ‘of a piece’ with the design of the castle.

Agree? Disagree? Feel free to comment or get in touch.

[1] Galloway, J., Keene, D. and Murphy, M. (1996), “Fuelling the City: Production and Distribution of Firewood and Fuel in London’s Region, 1290-1400” in The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 49, No. 3 (Aug., 1996), pp. 447-472

Do you know of any bits of Bodiam Castle that might be missed by most people? Do let me know if you do and I’ll try and include them.

Previously on Bodiam Castle Bits…

  1. SW corner of the courtyard
  2. “The Lady’s Bower”
  3. A chapel window

Bodiam Castle Bits #3 – a chapel window

Bodiam Castle Bits is a series of posts looking at details of the castle that may have passed you by. Bodiam Castle is a NT property in East Sussex, England.

This post looks at a window in the Chapel.

The north window

A view of the chapel from the courtyard looking east

Pic. 1: A view of the chapel from the courtyard looking east

The context

The chapel is dominated by the restored east window (F). The chancel would have been at a higher level than the current platform. The piscina to the left of the Sacristy (priest’s room) doorway (D) indicates this. The floor level was approximately where the middle rail of the new fence is. Patterned tiles were found when this area was excavated in the 1920s. George Curzon describes them as “small glazed tiles, with bevelled edges, of blue, yellow, green and brown colours” in his 1926 report. Fragments of stained glass were also found.

The Lord’s and lady’s apartments are immediately south (to the right) of the chapel. The window to the Lord’s room (A) can be seen high up on the right. This is where the Lord and Lady and their important guests would be during the mass. There is also access to the upper floor at B. I am not sure whether this would have opened onto a wooden gallery. There is a door to the “Lady’s Bower” from the knave (C). There may have been a door between the chapel and the courtyard but no evidence of this has been found.

It is the small north window indicated by the arrow (above) that is this post’s ‘bit’ for today.

The north window viewed from the chancel

Pic. 2: The north window viewed from the chancel

The window

It’s a narrow window set much lower than the east window. Early writers on the castle suggested that it was a dole window or lepers’ squint. A dole window is where the poor might come to receive charity. A squint is an opening through which those not in the knave of the church might see the host being raised by the priest. Lepers would not have been allowed inside a church. The window would traditionally have been barred and/or shuttered.

When you view the window from outside the castle both suggestions seem, on the face of it, unlikely:

Pic. 3: The chapel from outside

Pic. 3: The chapel from outside

Pic. 3 shows how the chapel breaks the symmetrical rectangle of the castle. Its projection creates the narrow, north facing chancel wall. The north window is clearly visible. You can see that it is set much lower than the east window but it is still high above the water. Even with a boat there would be no chance of receiving doles or seeing anything. The projecting NE drum tower blocks any view of the window from the distant north bank of the moat.

Here’s a closer view of the window (right):

Pic. 4: a closer view

Pic. 4: a closer view. East window to the left, our window lower right

In pic. 2 you can see a window in the NE tower’s lower residential room through the window in question. Could our window be a squint for someone in that room? A quick trip to the room (now a display case room) and a sneaky look from the windowsill discounts that as a possibility. You can see into the chapel if you crane your neck, but the angle means that you look into the knave rather than the chancel.

The purpose

So what is it? Curzon (1926), while dismissing the above options which had been suggested by his predecessors, says

“I … prefer to think that the window may have been designed for the natural purpose of most windows, namely to give additional light.”

which, on the face of it sounds reasonable and defensible. He also, in the same section, makes the case for a now lost west door and window.

However, the size of the window, its low setting relative to the interior and its north-facing aspect in what is effectively an alcove suggests that the amount of light it would contribute would be negligible. A west window, which Curzon argues for, would be much more effective and could be much larger. Why go to the cost of engineering a small window on the dull side? It could just be a poor choice – the castle, though impressive, is not perfectly designed and engineered.

Could it be, however, that it is an architectural quote – a symbol? People seeing it would have associated it with acts of charity. The castle is full of all sorts of symbolism, both military and domestic. Many of the military elements are famously ineffective except as symbols. Perhaps this window is there to show people attending mass what a beneficent man the builder of Bodiam Castle is. It doesn’t matter that the window is impractical – it tells a story, as so much of the castle is designed to do.

Agree? Disagree? Feel free to comment or get in touch.

Do you know of any bits of Bodiam Castle that might be missed by most people? Do let me know if you do and I’ll try and include them.